The Mauritius Supreme Court has handed down judgment on the challenge by Essar Steel against ArcelorMittal's US$1.5 billion arbitration award in proceedings relating to the supply of iron-ore pellets. For those who read the judgments of the Mauritius Supreme Court and (recently) the UK Privy Council in Betamax with interest (see my notes here: https://lnkd.in/g9U7cNZ and here: https://lnkd.in/gbKvfVp ), this judgment significantly and encouragingly advances Mauritian jurisprudence on the threshold for public policy challenges to awards. Here, Essar's complaints were found to be ill-founded and in any event not to amount to any basis to set aside the award on public policy grounds.
| less than a minute read
ArcelorMittal succeeds in Mauritius round of US$1.5bn arbitration battle with Essar Steel
"The relevant question, therefore, is not whether a party used (either well or at all) its opportunity to present its position, but rather whether it was afforded a reasonable opportunity to do so."
/Passle/5cc80bfbabdfe80ea0d70502/SearchServiceImages/2026-02-03-19-15-59-671-6982496f96586091c07005a4.jpg)
/Passle/5cc80bfbabdfe80ea0d70502/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-30-21-21-10-876-697d20c6e563ba3bdaac973b.jpg)
/Passle/5cc80bfbabdfe80ea0d70502/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-27-13-11-48-027-6978b99480777a881ec6d522.jpg)