The Mauritius Supreme Court has handed down judgment on the challenge by Essar Steel against ArcelorMittal's US$1.5 billion arbitration award in proceedings relating to the supply of iron-ore pellets. For those who read the judgments of the Mauritius Supreme Court and (recently) the UK Privy Council in Betamax with interest (see my notes here: https://lnkd.in/g9U7cNZ and here: https://lnkd.in/gbKvfVp ), this judgment significantly and encouragingly advances Mauritian jurisprudence on the threshold for public policy challenges to awards. Here, Essar's complaints were found to be ill-founded and in any event not to amount to any basis to set aside the award on public policy grounds.
| less than a minute read
ArcelorMittal succeeds in Mauritius round of US$1.5bn arbitration battle with Essar Steel
"The relevant question, therefore, is not whether a party used (either well or at all) its opportunity to present its position, but rather whether it was afforded a reasonable opportunity to do so."
/Passle/5cc80bfbabdfe80ea0d70502/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-09-11-06-22-456-6a27f3aee22b6af8adc860b7.jpg)
/Passle/5cc80bfbabdfe80ea0d70502/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-09-09-22-44-610-6a27db642331b443af0c5338.jpg)
/Passle/5cc80bfbabdfe80ea0d70502/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-05-13-16-22-255-6a22cc26697e498ae8399ad1.jpg)